Darryl's Blog
The Gospel Coalition
"We are a fellowship of evangelical churches deeply committed to renewing our faith in the gospel of Christ and to reforming our ministry practices to fully conform to the Scriptures." So begins the Foundational Documents (pdf) for The Gospel Coalition, a new group that held a one-day conference this past week.
The Foundational Documents continue:
We have become deeply concerned about some movements within traditional evangelicalism that seem to be diminishing the church’s life and leading us away from our historic beliefs and practices. On the one hand, we are troubled by the idolatry of personal consumerism and the politicization of faith; on the other hand, we are distressed by the unchallenged acceptance of theological and moral relativism. These have led to the easy abandonment of both biblical truth and the transformed living mandated by our historic faith. We not only hear of these influences, we see their effects. We have committed ourselves to invigorating churches with new hope and compelling joy based on the promises received by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone.
The documents continue with what one person calls "a robust confessional statement" and much more:
In the foundational documents there is a robust confessional statement along with a theological vision for ministry. The concerns in the later document touch many of the important issues facing the church in our day. Epistemological issues relating to truth, issues dealing with contextualization and culture, how we read Scripture, and the uniqueness of the gospel and gospel centered ministry. The focus on issues of justice, integrating faith and work, as well as the church living in culture as a counter-cultural community provides much needed wisdom for our day.
What to make of all this?
For years, a lot of us have sensed that something's wrong. Two of the most vocal groups have been the emerging and Reformed movements, who have shared many of the same concerns over evangelicalism, but who have come up with very different solutions to the problems they see.
There's a lot to like about the Gospel Coalition's approach, which comes from the Reformed side of the equation:
- It's deeply theological and focuses on both orthodoxy and orthopraxy. If the church is going to find its way, it's going to be because of a robust theology that's lived out. This is a huge step in that direction.
- This statement addresses the issues of today, unlike so many of the confessional statements that were written to address the issues of long ago. It's refreshing to read a statement that tackles issues like epistemology and contextualization.
- I love the focus on gospel-centered ministry. If you haven't heard Tim Keller on this subject then you really need to.
- It's the most helpful statement I've seen of what effective and biblical ministry could look like within evangelicalism. It focuses on empowered worship, evangelistic effectiveness (churches that reach secular and postmodern people, not just cultural conservatives), counter-cultural community, the integration of faith and work, and the doing of justice and mercy.
I'm not naive. Some have histories with some of the people involved - D.A. Carson, who has been a sharp critic of the emerging church, and Mark Driscoll, who always seems to be in the middle of controversy. On the other hand, some may suspect Tim Keller since he's so widely respected, even by some in the emerging movement. Can he really be Reformed and orthodox with such fans? Some won't be able to see past issues like complementarianism. Some will say that the document isn't radical enough, while on the other side some will suspect it of going too far.
As for me and my house - well, at least me and the dogs - we're encouraged. I've long had this dream that older and newer forms of the church could join together in tackling the issues of effective Christian ministry in our day, and this document makes an important contribution.
Will it be accepted within evangelicalism? Not by everyone, but I hope its impact is felt. We could use more churches like Redeemer. Will it be rejected by newer forms of the church? Maybe - but I hope they see lots of common ground and don't reject it prematurely. There's too much that's really good in this to pass by it too quickly.
Churches that combine gospel centered ministry, winsome but theologically substantial preaching, effective evangelism and apologetics, cultural engagement in arts, business, scholarship, government, and a passion for justice and social action? Bring it on, and then some.
Update: The original PDF has been taken down. Steve McKoy has been kind enough to post the documents, and Tim Keller has confirmed that it's the latest revision.
Categories
Church , Emerging Church , Theology0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Gospel Coalition.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.dashhouse.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1713
While Tim Keller is indeed widely respected, even by those who may not precisely agree with his theological convictions and persuasions, I'm not sure how well the whole coalition would be received by those who may not precisely agree. Some named in that coalition have been come across as somewhat abrasive to others, and that may be a liability if the coalition is attempting to find a centrist position and a differentiation from other theological advocacies like Together For The Gospel or Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals.
dj-
You might be right, but I don't feel like the Gospel Coalition is out trying to find a "centrist" position. Carson made it clear that their goal was to develop a coalition of reformed churches who placed their emphasis on the Gospel as it has been understood in the reformed tradition. No doubt Carson rubs some people the wrong way at times (including me, and I tend to agree with him) but their goal is to help define a large section of the currently undefinable category of "evangelicalism".
Ufortunately I feel like you are correct in stating that there is going to be little difference between the Gospel Coalition and together for the Gospel...except that the Gospel Coalition has Driscoll instead of MacAurthur.
I'm all for anyone who is trying to speak the gospel into our culture, but I'm through trying to make common cause with people who deny women opportunity to use all their gifts, or waste time trying to dictate roles for men and women. Jesus wasn't busy doing that, and life-on-earth is too short. There are too many lost people who can't hear past that stuff anyway, for whom one would have to make long explanations before they would give anyone who talks about that a second hearing - I have kingdom work to do. Let Mark Driscoll and his pals do what they do. I'll work elsewhere.