Web home of the Dash family

Darryl's Blog

Nothing but it

| | Comments (6) | TrackBacks (0)

I was reading in U2BYU2 about the early days of the band. They would go to these music competitions and see other bands. A lot of these bands were a lot more skilled. Bono says:

There were bands there that could play in time and in tune and with great confidence, all of which we couldn't pull off. But, you know, some bands have everything but it. We had nothing but it.

I've been in churches that have everything but it. I'm longing to be part of a church that has nothing but it.

Categories

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Nothing but it.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.dashhouse.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1505

6 Comments

I'm thinking that it is more caught than taught, that it's almost a DNA thing. You're right, though. When itis missing, it's hard to get things going.

don said:

that would be rITchview then?

Naomi said:

Nice post. Encouraging. You took our attention to the 'it' in last sunday's sermon (only 'it' was a He).
What would our churches look like if they had Him, and not necessarily a whole lot of other things?
They'd be revolutional, that's what.
They'd have 'it'.
:~)

Hey, "revolutional"... I may use that...

rick said:

I agree that everything without "it" is dissatisfying.

However, I don't see everything and "it" as an either/or. Why not just get "it" back, if we already have "everything" (which I'm not convinced as many do as think they do)?

And how many of you remember the "I Found It" fad? Another Christian flash in the pan. Assuming they had "it," ISTM that lacking the "everything else" precluded sustaining the "it" alone. Looks like both/and is the way to go - hence Webber's "Ancient-Future" focus.

Leave a comment

Please enter the letter "v" in the field below: