About
Search
Subscribe (RSS)
Subscribe to Church Planting Updates

Subscribe to Blog by Email

Enter your email address:

Recent Comments
Twitter
Reading
  • The Power of Uniqueness: Why You Can't Be Anything You Want To Be
    The Power of Uniqueness: Why You Can't Be Anything You Want To Be
    by Arthur F Miller, William D Hendricks
« It's hard to be seeker-sensitive when you work for Jesus | Main | What is repentance? Part Two »
Saturday
Jun022007

Church renewal vs. church planting

Michael Spencer argues that church planting must take precedence over church renewal:

I’m convinced that the greatest answer evangelicals have within their power is the determination to start new churches. Renewal and revival of existing churches is a worthy cause, but I don’t think you are going to reverse the downward, deteriorating direction in most existing churches. The hope for evangelicalism lies in becoming a massive church planting movement, and in encouraging as many churches as possible to make the creation of networks of new churches a priority in their 5-25 year goals.

The resources evangelicals are pouring into facilities and staff for megachurches need to be directed towards new churches. It’s a decision for every church, but it may be the single most important decision a church can make. We don’t need bigger churches; we need more and more diverse churches.

Tim Keller has said some similar things. Church plants not only reach people that existing churches don't, but they help to revitalize existing churches.

No doubt there's a role for both renewal and planting, but I am wondering if we need to shift more of our energy to planting.

Reader Comments (4)

In my experience, most established churches may want to change to be more relevant, but know it may take a decade to happen, if ever. But if they can plant a church that can take a fresh approach to ministry, they can perhaps accomplish more. They won't alienate their current ministry core, and they can do something fresh.

June 2, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBrian Mullins

And it can depend entirely on the type of church plant. Too many plants have simply drained away believers from other local churches, creating a situation where the established church is crippled because of the loss, and the plant ends up filled with churched-folk.

June 2, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterwilsonian

I think it's a both/and proposition rather than an either/or. I've seen church plants die a horrible death - and old churches renewed. The Spirit of God is with the people of God, wherever they might be. The test is to respond to the Spirit.

June 2, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBill Kinnon

I really don't think the answer is more churches. When I look at Christianity, now from the outside, I keep coming back to if its true it should make more of a difference. I find myself a much happier and kinder person away from the organization. The longer I stay away from church the less frustration I feel. I know I'm not alone in this experience. Many of my friends who grew up in churches can't see the relevance to church in their daily lives. Somehow Christianity needs to show how it's relevant. I don't know the answer but I don't think its in more churches. Rob

June 3, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRob Auld

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>