I grew up hearing about the dangers of ecumenism. It seems that ecumenism meant compromise, and compromise quickly led to abandonment of the gospel.
I’ve wrestled with this issue many times since my childhood, in my relationship with other community churches, individuals, and with the doctrinal and ethical issues that arise. I’ve enjoyed my relationship with Christians from other streams, learning from them without abandoning the distinctiveness of my stream. But how far is too far? How can we pursue unity without compromising doctrine?
In Your Church is Too Small, John H. Armstrong argues for a unity that crosses social, cultural, racial, and denominational lines. It’s not denominational or organizational unity, and it’s not a unity that abandons truth in order to build consensus. Instead, it’s a relational unity based on the Great Tradition of the church – “the core, elemental truths that are essential to historical and confessional Christianity.” A good place to start, he suggests, is the Apostles’ Creed. Armstrong argues for what he calls missional-ecumenism, because he believes that we must be shaped by a God who desires unity and who has called us to participate in his mission to a world that does not know the gospel.
Armstrong comes from the Reformed tradition. He knows that many people are going to question his approach. It’s one thing to display unity with others from similar traditions, but where do we start with the Catholic and Orthodox streams? Armstrong suggests that we begin relationally and interpersonally, through prayer and conversation. It will require “unusual grace and profound sacrifice.” It will avoid twin errors of emphasizing unity at the expense of doctrine, and minimizing doctrine at the expense of unity. In short, it will take a miracle – but it’s worth pursuing.
Armstrong lists those who have taught him about this unity, including Lesslie Newbigin, John Stott, and J.I. Packer. Packer wrote the foreword. Packer and Stott illustrate the challenge of taking up this vision. Stott and Martyn Lloyd-Jones famously quarreled over whether or not it was right to stay within the Anglican union. Packer is part of a church in Vancouver that has been wrestling with its relationship to the Anglican Church of Canada. The obstacles to unity are too many to count.
But Armstrong’s book is an important one. The issue of unity is too important to address, unless we choose to ignore key passages of Scripture. We may not be able to solve all the problems, but Armstrong does two things really well. One: he makes unity an issue. Two: he gives some solid advice for how individuals can pursue unity at the individual and local level. I highly recommend that you get this book and wrestle with the issues he raises. It’s too important an issue to be ignored.
A blog tour is taking place this week. Koinonia has a list of the blogs taking part in the tour.
More at Amazon.com | YourChurchIsTooSmall.com | Zondervan.com
This book was provided for review by Zondervan

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
We need more Lloyd-Jones today who will take a stand for orthodoxy.
Unity. Hmmm?
Sometimes good and some times, er, not so good?
Just wondering…
What if God is the author of our disagreements and separations?
“And all things are of God…” 2 Cor 5:18, Rom 11:36, Col 1:16-17, etc.
Didn’t God confuse man’s language once before?
Aren’t those things that happened to others,
written for us to learn from?
Now all these things happened unto them for examples:
and they are written for our admonition,
upon whom the ends of the world are come.
1 Cor 10:11
For whatsoever things were written aforetime
were written for our learning,
that we through patience and comfort of the scriptures have hope.
Rom 15:4
Didn’t God intervene when “man was in unity”
with their own devices, their own plans,
trying to build something themselves,
to reach heaven and “make a name for themselves?”
Could that be the ekklesia’s problem today also?
Doing their own thing – NOT God’s thing?
**Man trying to build something?
(Movements? Denominations? Church Planting?)
**And make a name for themselves?
(“Titles” on buildings, schools, websites, books, diplomas, etc.)
**Being in unity they could accomplish anything?
wikipedia lists many, Nay – 1,000′s, of Denominations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_denominations
…let us build us a city and a tower,
whose top may reach unto heaven;
and let us make us a name…
Gen 11:4
Gen 11:6-8
And the LORD said, Behold,
the people is one, (unity?)(this doesn’t sound good?)
and they have all one language; (unity-sound alike?)
and this they begin to do: (work together?)
and now nothing will be restrained from them,
(we can do anything, working together?)
which they have imagined to do.
(“the imagination of man’s heart is evil.”(
( Gen 6:5, Gen 8:21, Jer 3:17, Jer 11:8.)
Go to, let us go down,
and there **confound their language,** that they may
**not understand one another’s speech…**
(Hmmm? Sound familiar?)
(Baptist, Pentecostal, Reformed, Calvinist, Egalitarian, Mercy Lord… )
God often gives us what we ask for, and, “A Little Bit Extra.”
Want some “Meat” in the wilderness?
God also sends “leanness to the soul.” Psalm 106:15. Oy Vey!
Want some “Kings” to rule over us?
How did that work out? 1 Sam 8:11-19 Ouch!
“Traditions of men” nullify the word of God.
Mark 7:13
Hmmm? Just wondering…
What if God is the author of our disagreements and separations?
Then what…???
A very interesting short comment about Lloyd-Jones. All who know him will readily know he felt Packer and Stott abandoned gospel principles and thus he walked away from them in mission and ministry in the UK. This was, to some, a great thing. To most, me included, it was a sad day. MLJ was a great man. But so are Packer and Stott.
This underscores the very problem this excellent review stresses. When you adopt a particular kind of separatism you adopt an ecclesiology that excludes Christians, real orthodox honest to goodness biblical believers. I am asking some important questions about this practice, which I tell readers I once accepted. The best way to get my sense is in my story since I have lived on both sides of this divide.